Coal plant ‘will hit African poor’

July 4th, 2009

SAS readers, these are the type of people that we are up against. Anti-poverty campaigners are the ones that feast on carrot juice and raisins, with a peanut thrown in for dessert. These same dimwits are totally against building nuclear power stations and coal fired stations, but have yet to come up with any viable alternative.  How building a coal fired power station in Kent, UK is going to deprive people in Africa from water, leading to drought, is quite beyond me. Perhaps someone more intelligent than I am can explain it. Notice phrases like ‘could lead, might be’ etc. One is never sure, is one!!!

Creating a new coal plant in Kent could lead to 100,000 more people in the developing world losing their water supply during dry seasons, it has been claimed. 

Ed Miliband is being urged to reject plans for a new coal-fired power plant at Kingsnorth

Anti-poverty campaigners at the World Development Movement (WDM) also said the controversial plan could be responsible for up to 60,000 more people suffering from drought in Africa.

And they said about 30,000 others could lose their homes every year due to coastal flooding if the Government approves the plant at Kingsnorth on the Hoo Peninsula in Kent.

Energy giant E.ON has submitted a hotly-contested application for a £1 billion investment to create the first new coal-fired power plant in Britain for 30 years at Kingsnorth.

The company says that, if built, it could set a new benchmark for cleaner coal-fired generation in the UK, producing enough electricity to supply around 1.5 million homes.

But environmentalists fear it would be a step backwards in the UK’s commitment to fight climate change and they insist that coal is the most polluting way of generating electricity. Opponents have piled pressure on Climate and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and have called on him to show commitment to tackling global poverty and climate change by rejecting the plan.

In newly-released figures, the WDM also said that up to 40,000 more people could be exposed to malaria, and that 50,000 more people could go hungry due to drought and lower crop yields if the Kingsnorth plans gains approval.

Deborah Doane, director of the WDM, said: “These figures reveal, for the first time, the devastating human impact of building a new Kingsnorth coal power station. The world’s poorest people will lose their water supply, food and homes, and ultimately will die as a direct result of our desire to burn more coal.

“The Government must not give the green light to any new coal power stations in the UK unless all of the carbon emissions are captured and buried from day one.”

A spokesman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change said: “Regardless of what happens in the UK, the reality is that coal will continue to be used around the world so the challenge is to decarbonise this form of electricity generation. That is why the UK is leading the way in developing carbon capture and storage technology and is funding up to four demonstration projects.”

Source:  http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090704/tuk-coal-plant-will-hit-african-poor-6323e80.html

I am completely paranoid - rape victim

July 4th, 2009

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?art_id=vn20090701053949716C498877

 

I am completely paranoid - rape victim

 

A Durban nurse who was gang-raped for six hours, while her fiance watched helplessly, says she lives her life in fear of it happening again.

And while she got “some closure” this week, when one of her rapists was sentenced to three life terms plus 27 years’ imprisonment, the 40-year-old woman says her life will never be the same.

After the sentencing of Tandaso Peterson Nombele, 29, in the Durban Regional Court this week, his victim said she had been in hospital six times for depression and post traumatic stress since the attack at Ansteys Beach on the Bluff in February 2007.

 

“I am completely paranoid. I am terrified and I don’t like going out. Each time I manage to pick myself up, I relapse. Sometimes I just don’t know how to live.”

 

The woman and her fiance were sitting on a blanket, having a picnic on the beach one evening when, at about 7pm, she noticed shadows crouching near her.

“I started screaming and running. But one got me and another got my fiance. I was trying to get away but he stabbed me and punched me.”

She said her attackers told her they would kill her fiance if she did not stop screaming and fighting. She obeyed and they were then dragged into the bush. That was when the rapes began.

During the six-hour ordeal, the couple were taken to various other spots on the beach.

“I thought they were going to kill us. We were just waiting to die,” she said.

Finally, at about 1am the next morning, their attackers tied up their feet and tied their hands together. They were warned not to escape because there were others on the beach who would do the same thing to them.

“We waited 10 minutes. My fiance managed to bite the ropes off my feet but we could not undo our hands. We managed to get back to the car and saw shadows. Thinking it was fishermen we ran forward, but it was them and they came after us again, hitting us and punching us,” she said.

Still tied together by their hands, the couple first fled into the sea and then, fearing drowning, ran to the other end of the beach, where fishermen came to their rescue and called the police.

Two men - one of them Nombele, a gardener from the Bluff - were arrested soon after by Brighton Beach detectives. Nombele was this week convicted of three counts of rape, indecent assault, robbery and assault by Magistrate Gert Botha.

He was sentenced to life imprisonment on each rape count, seven years for indecent assault, five years for assault and 15 years for robbery.

The life sentences would run concurrently.

His co-accused was acquitted because of a discrepancy over identification. The investigating officer, Inspector Marius van der Looy, said a third suspect was still on the run.

The victim says she could not rest while he was loose.

HALF DEVIL, HALF CHILD – Rudyard Kipling’s opinion of Africoons

July 4th, 2009

(Methinks the wise Mr Kipling got his proportions wrong though)

Today I picked up a copy of the Crap, er Cape Times and saw another story where, after causing a bad accident, the black driver RAN AWAY..! 

Driving back from Montagu to CT on my own I had time to reflect on this and  think about some of the other enormous differences between typical white and typical black behavior.

I passed one of those roadworks flag wavers and, as he was waving his flag, he was dancing a little jig – if it were cold I could maybe understand but it was about 20deg and the sun was shining.   I thought to myself “I dont think a white would do that UNLESS he was retarded or mentally disturbed”.

Then I saw a very snappily overdressed black wearing dark pants and shirt and a fancy ”White Sports Coat” (not sure about the pink carnation..!) – as if he were going to a dance – and there he was jigging and skipping along in the dusty central reservation as happy as if he had just won the lottery.  (is this constant jigging where the word “jiggaboo” came from?)

Now if we saw adult whites behaving like that we’d think they were “nutters” wouldn’t we?   

Lets be honest with ourselves – what we are seeing so often in adult blacks is the behavioral patterns of young children.  In fact anyone who lives in Africa is so used to seeing childish behavior in adult blacks that we don’t think twice about it, and in our interactions with blacks we are so patronizing and so forgiving of blacks and – even when they have done something utterly stupid and harmful - we don’t judge them anywhere near as harshly as we would a white behaving in a similar fashion.   We calmly accept idiotic behavior from blacks and we come to enjoy their “little” cultural eccentricities.  

 

 

 

 

 

And on this blog we occasionally get an ”educated” black doing what they do best - a ”drive-by shooting” -after unleashing a torrent of abuse they can never resist the predictably childish boast about how white wimmins love ”muh dick”.  

I am sure that if you asked white tourists what they thought of fully grown black men dancing a little jig and/or singing to themselves as they “walked” down the street, they would probably explain it away in terms of cultural relativity like “Oh bless them - they are not as self-conscious as us boringly uptight whites – I think its a wonderfully spontaneous expression of African musicality, open-ness and gregariousness”.  In a word, I am sure they think its “Cute”.   And isn’t that exactly what we say when children behave like children do?  

I would love to see the tourists reaction/excuse were I to put to them “but if you saw an adult white man behaving in such a manner you would think him to be a “simpleton” or even a “lunatic” to be avoided at all costs, wouldn’t you?”

It is therefore a cruel irony that SA whites are regarded as the worlds worst racists when they are in fact the most forgiving of TKB. 

I heard the blacks have a saying “if you want to kill a dog,you must first give it a bad name”.   

The following essay from an American teacher in a black school is excellent - it is much longer than I thought when I first began reading it – but for those interested in the yawning racial and cultural chasm between blacks and whites, well worth the effort.

Thanks to the person who posted this link ……     

http://martynemko.blogspot.com/2009/06/white-teacher-speaks-out-what-is-it.html

What is it Like to Teach Black Students?    by Christopher Jackson

Until recently I taught at a predominantly black high school in a southeastern state. 

 

The mainstream press gives a hint of what conditions are like in black schools, but only a hint. Expressions journalists use like “chaotic” or “poor learning environment” or “lack of discipline” do not capture what really happens. There is nothing like the day-to-day experience of teaching black children and that is
what I will try to convey.
 
Most whites simply do not know what black people are like in large numbers,
and the first encounter can be a shock.

One of the most immediately striking things about my students was that they were loud.  They had little conception of ordinary decorum. It was not unusual for five blacks to be screaming at me at once. Instead of calming down and waiting for a lull in the din to make their point—something that occurs to even the dimmest white students—blacks just tried to yell over each other.

 

It did no good to try to quiet them, and white women were particularly inept at trying.      I sat in on one woman’s class as she begged the children to pipe down.
They just yelled louder so their voices would carry over hers.  
Many of my black students would repeat themselves over and over again—just louder.                It It was as if they suffered from Tourette syndrome. They seemed to have no conception of waiting for an appropriate time to say something.                                                                                                      They would get ideas in their heads and simply had to shout them out.

 

 

I might be leading a discussion on government and suddenly be interrupted: “We gotta get more Democrats! Clinton, she good!” The student may seem content with that outburst but two minutes later, he would suddenly start yelling again: “Clinton good!”
Anyone who is around young blacks will probably get a constant diet of rap music.
Blacks often make up their own jingles, and it was not uncommon for 15 black boys to swagger into a classroom, bouncing their shoulders and jiving back.
They were yelling back and forth, rapping 15 different sets of words in the same harsh, rasping dialect.
 
 The words were almost invariably a childish form of boasting:
Who got dem shine rim, who got dem shine shoe, who got dem shine grill (gold and silver dental caps)?” The amateur rapper usually ends with a claim—in the crudest terms imaginable—that all womankind is sexually devoted to him. For whatever reason, my students would often groan instead of saying a particular word, as in, “She suck dat aaahhhh (think of a long grinding groan), she f**k dat aaaahhhh, she lick dat aaaahhh.”

 

So many black girls dance in the hall, in the classroom, on the chairs, next to the chairs, under
the chairs, everywhere. Once I took a call on my cell phone and had to step outside of class. I was away about two minutes but when I got back the black girls had lined up at the front of the classroom and were convulsing to the delight of the boys.
Many black people, especially black women, are enormously fat. Some are so fat I had to arrange special seating to accommodate their bulk. I am not saying there are no fat white students—there are—but it is a matter of numbers and attitudes. Many black girls simply do not care that they are fat. There are plenty
of white anorexics, but I have never met or heard of a black anorexic.

 

“Black women be big Mr. Jackson,” my students would explain.   “Is it okay in the black community to be a little overweight?” I ask.  Two obese black girls in front of my desk begin to dance, “You know dem boys lak juicy fruit, Mr. Jackson.” “Juicy” is a colorful black expression for the buttocks.Blacks, on average, are the most directly critical people I have ever met: “Dat shirt stupid.
Yo’ kid a bastard. Yo’ lips big.” Unlike whites, who tread gingerly around the subject of race, they can be brutally to the point. Once I needed to send a student to the office to deliver a message. I asked for volunteers, and suddenly you would think my classroom was a bastion of civic engagement. Thirty dark hands shot into the air.
 

My students loved to leave the classroom and slack off, even
if just for a few minutes, away from the eye of white authority.

 

 

I picked a light-skinned boy to deliver the message. One very black student was indignant: “You pick da half-breed.” And immediately other blacks take up the cry, and half a dozen mouths are screaming, “He half-breed.”
For decades, the country has been lamenting the poor academic performance of blacks and there is much to lament. There is no question, however, that many blacks come to school with a serious handicap that is not their fault. At home they have learned a dialect that is almost a different language. Blacks not only mispronounce words; their grammar is often wrong. When a black wants to ask, “Where is the bathroom?”
he may actually say “Whar da badroom be?” Grammatically, this is the equivalent of “Where the bathroom is?” And this is the way they speak in high school. Students write the way they speak, so this is the language that shows up in written assignments.
It is true that some whites face a similar handicap. They speak with what I would call a “country” accent
that is hard to reproduce but results in sentences such as “I’m gonna gemme a Coke.” Some of these country whites had to learn correct pronunciation and usage. The difference is that most whites
overcome this handicap and learn to speak correctly; many blacks do not.

Most of the blacks I taught simply had no interest in academic subjects. I taught history, and students would often say they didn’t want to do an assignment or they didn’t like history because it was all about white people.
Of course, this was “diversity” history, in which every cowboy’s black cook got a special page on how he contributed to winning the West, but black children still found it inadequate. So I would throw up my hands and assign them a project on a real, historical black person. My favorite was Marcus Garvey. They had never heard of him, and I would tell them to research him, but they never did. They didn’t care and they didn’t want to do any work.

Anyone who teaches blacks soon learns that they have a completely different view of government from whites. Once I decided to fill 25 minutes by having students write about one thing the government should do to improve America. I gave this question to three classes totaling about 100 students, approximately 80 of whom were black. My few white students came back with generally “conservative” ideas. “We need to cut off people who don’t work,” was the most common suggestion. 

 

 

 

Nearly every black gave a variation on the theme of “We need more government services.”

My students had only the vaguest notion of who pays for government services. For them, it was like a magical piggy bank that never goes empty. One black girl was exhorting the class on the need for more social services and I kept trying to explain that people, real live people, are taxed for the money to
pay for those services.  
 “Yeah, it come from whites,” she finally said. “They stingy anyway.”

“Many black people make over $50,000 dollars a year and you would also be taking away from your own
people,” I said.
She had an answer to that: “Dey half breed.” The class agreed. I let the subject drop.

Many black girls are perfectly happy to be welfare queens. On career day, one girl explained to the class that she was going to have lots of children and get fat checks from the government. No one in the class seemed to have any objection to this career choice.

Surprising attitudes can come out in class discussion. We were talking about the crimes committed in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and I brought up the rape of a young girl in the bathroom of the Superdome. A majority of my students believed this was a horrible crime but a few took it lightly. One black boy
spoke up without raising his hand: “Dat no big deal. They thought they is gonna die so they figured they have some fun. Dey jus’ wanna have a fun time; you know what I’m sayin’?” A few black heads nodded in agreement.

 

My department head once asked all the teachers to get a response from all students to the following question: “Do you think it is okay to break the law if it will benefit you greatly?” By then, I had been teaching for a while and was not surprised by answers that left a young, liberal, white woman colleague aghast. “Yeah” was the favorite answer. As one student explained, “Get dat green.”

 

There is a level of conformity among blacks that whites would find hard to believe.

They like one kind of music: rap. They will vote for one political party:Democrat.  They dance one way, speak one way, are loud the same way, and fail their exams in the same way. Of course, there are exceptions but they are rare.

Whites are different.  Some like country music, others heavy metal, some prefer pop, and still others,
God forbid, enjoy rap music. They have different associations, groups, almost ideologies.                     There are jocks, nerds, preppies, and hunters.
 

Blacks are all—well—black, and they are quick to let
other blacks know when they deviate from the norm.

One might object that there are important group differences among blacks that a white man simply cannot detect. I have done my  best to find them, but so far as I can tell, they dress the same, talk the same, think the same. Certainly, they form rival groups, but the groups are not different in any discernible way. There
simply are no groups of blacks that are as distinctly different from each other as white “nerds,” “hunters,” or “Goths,” for example.

How the world looks to blacks
 

 

 

One point on which all blacks agree is that everything is “racis’.”                                    This is one message of liberalism they have absorbed completely.

 

 

 

 

Did you do your homework? “Na, homework racis’.” Why did you get an F on the test? “Test racis’.”

I was trying to teach a unit on British philosophers and the first thing the students noticed about Bentham, Hobbes, and Locke was “Dey all white! Where da black philosopher a’?” I tried to explain there were no blacks in eighteenth century Britain. You can probably guess what they said to that: “Dat racis’!” He just smirked, looked out the window, and sucked air through his teeth. Perhaps this was a regional thing, but the blacks often sucked air through their teeth as a wordless expression of disdain or hostility. 

One student accused me of deliberately failing him on a test because I didn’t like black people.  

Blacks are keenly interested in their own racial characteristics. I have learned, for example, that some blacks have “good hair.” Good hair is black parlance for black-white hybrid hair. Apparently, it is less kinky, easier to style, and considered more attractive.   Blacks are also proud of light skin.
Imagine two black students shouting insults across the room. One is dark but slim; the other light and obese. The dark one begins the exchange: “You fat, Ridario!” Ridario smiles, doesn’t deign to look
at his detractor, shakes his head like a wobbling top, and says, “You wish you light skinned.”

They could go on like this, repeating the same insults over and over.

My black students had nothing but contempt for Hispanic immigrants. They would vent their feelings so crudely that our department strongly advised us never to talk about immigration in class in case the principal or some outsider might overhear.

Whites were “racis’,” of course, but they thought of us at least as Americans. Not the Mexicans. Blacks have a certain, not necessarily hostile understanding of white people. They know how whites act, and it is clear they believe whites are smart and are good at organizing things.

At the same time, they probably suspect whites are just putting on an act when they talk about equality, as if it is all a sham that makes it easier for whites to control blacks.

Blacks want a bigger piece of the American pie. I’m convinced that if it were up to them they would give whites a considerably smaller piece than whites get now, but they would give us something. They
wouldn’t give Mexicans anything.

What about black boys and white girls? No one is supposed to notice this or talk about it but it is glaringly obvious: Black boys are obsessed with white girls. I’ve witnessed the following drama countless times. A black boy saunters up to a white girl. The cocky black dances around her, not really in a menacing
way. It’s more a shuffle than a threat. As he bobs and shuffles he asks, “When you gonna go wit’ me?”
There are two kinds of reply. The more confident white girl gets annoyed, looks away from the black and shouts, “I don’t wanna go out with you!” The more demure girl will look at her feet and mumble a polite excuse but ultimately say no.  There is only one response from the black boy: “You racis’.”
Many girls—all too many—actually feel guilty because they do not want to date blacks.

Most white girls at my school stayed away from blacks, but a few, particularly the ones who were addicted to drugs, fell in with them.There is something else that is striking about blacks.

“Do you think I really hate black people?” “Yeah.”
“Have I done anything to make you feel this way? How do you know?”
“You just do.” “Why do you say that?”

My students were sometimes unable to see the world except through the lens of their own blackness. I had a class that was host to a German exchange student. One day he put on a Power Point presentation with famous German landmarks as well as his school and family.  From time to time during the presentation,
blacks would scream, “Where da black folk?!” The exasperated German tried several times to explain that there were no black people where he lived in Germany. The students did not believe him. I told them Germany is in Europe, where white people are from, and Africa is where black people are from. They
insisted that the German student was racist, and deliberately refused to associate with blacks.

 

 

They seem to have no sense of romance, of falling in love.
What brings men and women together is sex, pure and simple,

and there is a crude openness about this. There are many degenerate whites, of course, but some of my white students were capable of real devotion and tenderness, emotions that seemed absent from blacks—especially the boys.

Black schools are violent and the few whites who are too poor to escape are caught in the storm. The violence is astonishing, not so much that it happens, but the atmosphere in which it happens.
Blacks can be smiling, seemingly perfectly content with what they are doing, having a good time, and then, suddenly start fighting. It’s uncanny. Not long ago, I was walking through the halls and a group of black boys were walking in front of me. All of a sudden they started fighting with another group in the hallway.
White weaklings are particularly susceptible, but mostly to petty violence. They may be slapped or get a couple of kicks when they are trying to open a bottom locker. Typically, blacks save the hard, serious violence for each other.
Blacks are extraordinarily quick to take offense.                                                                            Once I accidentally scuffed a black boy’s white sneaker with my shoe. He immediately rubbed his body
up against mine and threatened to attack me. I stepped outside the class and had a security guard escort the student to the office. It was unusual for students to threaten teachers physically this way, but among themselves, they were quick to fight for similar reasons.

 

The real victims are the unfortunate whites caught in this. They are always in danger and their educations suffer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There was a lot of promiscuous sex among my students and this led to violence.                Black girls were constantly fighting over black boys. It was not uncommon to see two girls literally ripping each other’s hair out with a police officer in the middle trying to break up the fight. The black boy they were fighting over would be standing by with a smile, enjoying the show he had created.     For reasons I cannot explain, boys seldom fought over girls.

 

Pregnancy was common among the blacks, though many black girls were so fat I could not tell the difference.  

 

I don’t know how many girls got abortions, but when they had the baby they usually stayed in school and had their own parents look after the child. The school did not offer daycare.

 

 

Security guards are everywhere in black schools—we had one on every hall. They also sat in on unruly classes and escorted students to the office. They were unarmed, but worked closely with the three city police officers who were constantly on duty.   There was a lot of drug-dealing at my school. This was a good way to make a fair amount of money but it also gave boys power over girls who wanted drugs. An addicted girl—black or white—became the plaything of anyone who could get her drugs.

 

One of my students was a notorious drug dealer. Everyone knew it. He was 19 years old and in eleventh grade. Once he got a score of three out of 100 on a test. He had been locked up four times since he was 13.

 

One day, I asked him, “Why do you come to school?” He wouldn’t answer. He just looked out the window, smiled, and sucked air through his teeth. His friend Yidarius ventured an explanation: “He get dat green and get dem females.” “What is the green?” I asked. “Money or dope?” “Both,” said Yidarius with a smile.

A very fat black interrupted from across the room: “We get dat lunch,” Mr.Jackson. “We gotta get dat lunch and brickfuss.” He means the free breakfast and lunch poor students get every day.  “Nigga, we know’d you be lovin’ brickfuss!” shouts another student.

Some readers may believe that I have drawn a cruel caricature of black students. After all, according to official figures some 85 percent of them graduate.  It would be instructive to know how many of those scraped by with barely a C- record. They go from grade to grade and they finally get their diplomas
because there is so much pressure on teachers to push them through. It saves money to move them along, the school looks good, and the teachers look good.

Many of these children should have been failed, but the system would crack under their weight if they were all held back.

How did my experiences make me feel about blacks? Ultimately, I lost sympathy for them. In so many ways
they seem to make their own beds. There they were in an integrationist’s fantasy—in the same classroom with white students, eating the same lunch, using the same bathrooms, listening to the same teachers—and yet the blacks fail while the whites pass.

One tragic outcome among whites who have been teaching for too long is that it can engender something close to hatred. One teacher I knew gave up fast food—not for health reasons but because where he lived most fast-food workers were black. He had enough of blacks on the job. This was an extreme example but years of frustration can take their toll. Many of my white colleagues with any experience were well on their way to that state of mind.

There is an unutterable secret among teachers: Almost all realize that blacks do not respond to traditional white instruction. Does that put the lie to environmentalism? Not at all. It is what brings about endless, pointless innovation that is supposed to bring blacks up to the white level. The solution is more diversity—or put more generally, the solution is change.  Change is an almost holy word in education, and you can fail a million times as long as you keep changing. That is why liberals keep revamping the curriculum and the way it is taught.

For example, teachers are told that blacks need hands on instruction and more group work.  Teachers are told that blacks are more vocal and do not learn through reading and lectures. The implication is that they
have certain traits that lend themselves to a different kind of teaching.

Whites have learned a certain way for centuries but it just doesn’t work with blacks. Of course, this implies racial differences but if pressed, most liberal teachers would say different racial learning styles come from some indefinable cultural characteristic unique to blacks. Therefore, schools must change,
America must change. But into what? How do you turn quantum physics into hands-on instruction or group work? No one knows, but we must keep changing until we find something that works.

Public school has certainly changed since anyone reading this was a student. I have a friend who teaches elementary school, and she tells me that every week the students get a new diversity lesson, shipped in fresh from some bureaucrat’s office in Washington or the state capital. She showed me the materials
for one week: a large poster, about the size of a forty-two inch flat-screen television. It shows an utterly diverse group—I mean diverse: handicapped, Muslim, Jewish, effeminate, poor, rich, brown, slightly brown, yellow, etc.—sitting at a table, smiling gaily, accomplishing some undefined task. The poster comes with
a sheet of questions the teacher is supposed to ask. One might be: “These kids sure look different, but they look happy. Can you tell me which one in the picture is an American?”

Some eight-year-old, mired in ignorance, will point to a white child like himself. “That one.”

The teacher reads from the answer, conveniently printed along with the question. “No, Billy, all these children are Americans. They are just as American as you.”

The children get a snack, and the poster goes up on the wall until another one comes a week later. This is
what happens at predominately white, middle-class, elementary schools everywhere. Elementary school teachers love All of the Colors of the Race, by award-winning children’s poet Arnold Adoff.

These are some of the lines they read to the children: “Mama is chocolate …Daddy is vanilla … Me (sic) is better …It is a new color. It is a new flavor. For love. Sometimes blackness seems too black for me, and whiteness is too sickly pale; and I wish every one were golden.  Remember: long ago before people moved and migrated, and mixed and matched … there was one people: one color, one race. The colors are flowing
from what was before me to what will be after. All the colors.”

Many white students possess a certain innocence; their cheeks still blush.  Try as I might, I could not get the blacks to care one bit about Beethoven or Sherman’s march to the sea, or Tyrtaeus, or Oswald Spengler, or even liberals like John Rawls, or their own history. They cared about nothing I tried to teach them. When this goes on year after year it chokes the soul out of a teacher, destroys his pathos, and sends him guiltily searching for The Bell Curve on the Internet.

It is impossible to get blacks to care about such abstractions as property rights or democratic citizenship.
They do not see much further than the fact that you live in a big house and “we in da pro-jek.” Of course, there are a few loutish whites who will never think past their next meal and a few sensitive blacks for whom anything is possible, but no society takes on the characteristics of its exceptions.

I read a book by an expatriate Rhodesian who visited Zimbabwe not too many years ago. Traveling with a
companion, she stopped at a store along the highway. A black man materialized next to her car window. “Job, boss, (I) work good, boss,” he pleaded. “You give job.”   “What happened to your old job?”
the expatriate white asked. The black man replied in the straightforward manner of his race: “We drove
out the whites. No more jobs. You give job.”

At some level, my students understand the same thing. One day I asked the bored, black faces staring back
at me. “What would happen if all the white people in America disappeared tomorrow?”  “We screwed,” a young, pitch-black boy screamed back. The rest of the blacks laughed.

It is in the black man’s interest to have whites in Zimbabwe but he drives them out and starves.

Most whites do not think black Americans could ever do anything so irrational.  They see blacks on television smiling, fighting evil whites, embodying white values. But the real black is not on television, and you pull your purse closer when you see him, and you lock the car doors when he swaggers by with his pants hanging down almost to his knees.

For those of you with children, better a smaller house in a white district than a fancy one near a black school.  I have been in parent-teacher conferences that broke my heart: the child pleading with his parents to take him out of school; the parents convinced their child’s fears are groundless. If you love your child, show her you care—not by giving her fancy vacations or a car, but making her innocent years safe and happy. Give her the gift of a not-heavily black school.
Mr. Jackson now teaches at a majority-white school.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water, biscuits on govt menu

July 3rd, 2009

Ag, sjym, I feel SOOOOOOOO sorry (NOT) for the poor government officials who now have to be satisfied with water and biscuits - however, that diet might help to trim the excess lard many of them are carrying…  have you seen what lard barrels many of these parliamentarians are???

http://www.news24.com/Content/SouthAfrica/Politics/1057/7e8b9da8841d42de9531834ff58fa3f1/02-07-2009%2010-07/Water,_biscuits_on_govt_menu

Water, biscuits on govt menu

Cape Town - Tea, water and biscuits are on South Africa’s recession menu to replace lavish meals at some government meetings as the belt is tightened on public spending, a spokesperson said on Thursday.

“Budgets that are spent on meals or food in departments, travelling, are being slashed as we speak,” Themba Maseko told journalists while outlining plans in tough financial conditions.

The food budget in the state’s communication department, where Maseko is based, was slashed by over 80% to avoid having to provide meals.

“So that if there is anything [provided for journalists] it will just be tea and water and some biscuits as you’ll see outside here,” he said.

South Africa entered its first recession in 17 years, with the economy shrinking 6.4% in the first quarter of 2009, the second contraction in a row.

‘Loud and clear’ message

Maseko said government was getting the message “clear and loud” and ministers were leading the way in demonstrating how expenditures will be cut.

The measures include holding meetings outside of lunch hours, restricting invitations to meetings, and curbing travel.

“One of the decisions, for instance, discussed at the Cabinet meeting [on Wednesday] was that for international conferences the practise of hundreds of government officials attending UN meetings and sessions will come to an end.”

Deputy directors in one department were “very upset” after being left off the invitation list for a meeting after it was decided only directors and the chief director would attend, he said.

“You have to accommodate and feed those people,” said Maseko.

Pre World Cup Agitprop lies are starting…

July 3rd, 2009

According to a report released in Europe earlier this week, the following astounding statistical assertions are made:

1. That Britain is a more criminally violent society than South Africa;

2. That even Austria’s crime situation is substantially worse than South Africa.

Yes, you read right. The European Commission’s report states the following laughable bullshit:

Violent Crime Per 100 000 people

Britain:                2 034

Austria:               1 677

South Africa:       1 609

Sweden:               1 123

Annual Murder Rate

Britain:                 921

South Africa:        20 000

Austria and the UK has more violent contact crime than SA? AUSTRIA, of all places! These figures are so patently false and laughably ridiculous, one is stunned that some imbeciles are actually taking them seriously! One of our regular readers is a wealthy Austrian (ALL SA-based Austrians I’ve met are stupendously wealthy, as is usually the result of having a stratospheric IQ, combined with a Germanic work ethic and that Teutonic entrepreneurial spirit, but I digress) - ZIPF, please let us have your views on the claim that the magnificent classical cities Vienna, Salzburg and Innsbruck are dangerous nigger-infested slums on par with, and even more dangerous than Soweto, Alexandra and Khyelitsha…

Various “experts” cited by the British media said that the concept of “violence” is interpreted differently in different countries. With their slew of insane peecee laws I’m not surprised…for example, glaring ominously at another driver while sitting at a traffic light constitutes a violent act. Farting in a lift is violent antisocial behaviour. Giving someone the finger is probably Assault with the intent to do Grievous Bodily Harm, not to mention Crimen Injuria and the endless list of thought crimes you can now be charged with.

At the same time, in SA a completely different set of rules apply. Six bullet holes in the back of someone’s skull is put down to “suicide” - having your head & hands hacked off with a machete is a bad shaving accident, being disembowelled with a rusted tomahawk axe and having your liver & heart ripped out & eaten while still alive is recorded as “domestic violence” or “death through natural causes” or “poisoning”. If you’re lucky, being gang-raped by eight rapacious beasts might be listed as “sexual harassment” but only if you can name your assailants and are in possession of their ID numbers, residential addresses and their genealogical records for the past 60 years…

OK, perhaps I’m exaggerating a tad now but his is the kind of comparison these idiots are making. Unless its part of some cynical propaganda campaign to butter up prospective FIFA 2010 tourists to the criminal hell hole of Arsezania.

As expected, the usual coon criminal-loving denialists (who sooo detests this horribly incorrigible racist blog but spend hours and days here trolling their revisionist crap) wasted no time in plastering these worthless “statistics” all over the SAS comments sections, eager to “prove” that the out of control warzone like conditions we so regularly feature is a mere “perception”.

Some wise sage once said you got “lies, damned lies, and statistics”. Its truly amazing what you can do with stats - another clever dick once ‘proved’ that the increase in Japanese motorcycle imports to Europe was directly correlated to a decrease in cervical cancer amongst small town dwelling Catholic women with perky boobs, between the ages of 30 and 45 who had a predilection for rubbing Old Spice aftershave behind their ears.

With regard to the crime situation in the UK, there is no doubt that crime has sky-rocketed in past few years. Its still nowhere near SA levels, but with a flood of mud races to the British Isles, and massive infestations of shit skins in major cities certain neighbourhoods (e.g. Bradford, Brixton) have become de facto no-go areas for White Britons. See the link below for some mug shots of who is held responsible for violent crime in the UK: I an an Englishman website

Some Brits are waking up to the creeping turd world erosion of their way of life and this has seen an astronomical growth in rightist parties like the UKIP and especially the British National Party.

Most notable has been the growth of the BNP in areas most heavily infested by Paki’s, Jamaicans, Nigerians and other turd world vermin. If anything, this little factoid again proves that the luxurious, self-righteous multi-culti position of being a bleeding heart non-racialist quickly dissipates as cold, hard racial truth forces one to revisit one’s premises. Except of course for those pathological basket cases who stalk & troll this blog, but then I guess every village has to have a few idiots.

These ridiculous stats amazingly show UK violent crime to be far worse than that in SA, yet the same report reflects a UK murder rate of 921 per annum, compared to the SA murder rate of 20 000. Said figure of 20 000 has strangely been stuck at the 20K mark since the late 1990’s - anyone living in SA has seen an astronomical rise in criminality in the past 14 years, so how this figure remains static at 20K is rather odd.

Interpol and various other credible agencies (insurance & vehicle tracking companies etc) have put the figure at anywhere between 30 000 and 35 000 murders per annum in SA. Instead of the supposed 50 murders a day, the Medical Research Council puts the figure at 89 murders per day (and this was back in 2003/4). Read that report here.

———

More violent crime in Britain (than in SA)

2009-07-03 08:08

London - Statistics compiled by the European Commission indicate that there is more violent crime in Britain than in South Africa.

The British public, who are often warned about the situation regarding crime in South Africa, were caught off-guard by this news.

As far as violence in relation to population size is concerned, Britain is at the top of the list according to these statistics, with 2 034 violent crimes for 100 000 people in 2007.

In Austria this figure is 1 677 for 100 000 people, in South Africa it’s 1 609 and in Sweden it’s 1 123. The South African figure was an average for the period 2006 to 2007.

According to the British media, however, South Africa is still the world’s murder capital, with approximately 20 000 murders committed here annually, compared to 921 in Britain.

Europe’s most violent

The statistics are derived from European Commission documents, and were also distributed by the United Nations.

The British Conservative Party presented the data in the form of a table, and said the Labour party is to blame for the fact that Britain is now being considered Europe’s most violent nation.

On the list, labelled the “list of shame” by the Conservatives, South Africa (3rd) and Canada (6th) are the only two non-European countries in the top ten.

The Daily Mail, however, was told by experts that the fact that “violence” is interpreted differently in different countries should be taken into account. For instance, where a disturbance is considered a violent offence under British law, in other countries such as South Africa, it’s only considered a violent offence if someone is assaulted.

Another fact which has the British public concerned is that the incidence of violence has risen by 77% since 1998.

News websites were buzzing about the information on Thursday, and South Africans in Britain took part in the commentary with great enthusiasm.

Safe?

A certain Callum wrote on the Daily Mail’s website that he didn’t believe, even for a second, that the crime level in Britain is higher than in South Africa.

“Britain and Europe are safe places to live.”

In turn, Dean from Cape Town wrote that the news about Britain’s crime levels didn’t surprise him in the least, and that it was precisely for that reason that he moved to South Africa.

“I feel much safer walking down the streets of South Africa. Most of the crime that happens here is in Johannesburg.”

Another sceptic, Alan from London, believed the South African government’s policy is “not to properly record the true crime figures”.

‘Bring back artisan training colleges’

July 3rd, 2009



MAKING HIS POINT: Higher Education Minister Blade Nzimande addressing Cosatu delegates at their education and skills conference in Johannesburg, yesterday. PHOTO: VATHISWA RUSELO

Blade says old-style institutions worked

MINISTER of Higher Education Blade Nzimande has called on the labour movement to fight for the return of the old “apartheid-style” artisan training colleges.

“You as workers must fight for artisan colleges – started by public enterprises during apartheid – to come back and train black people.

“Most of these colleges have closed down. They must be reopened to train black artisans,” Nzimande said yesterday.

The minister was addressing Cosatu’s education and training conference in Johannesburg.

He said there was a need to improve Further Education Training (FET) colleges and other training institutions.

“Other institutions such as nursing, teacher training and agricultural colleges must be strengthened and revived,” he said.

FET colleges would be renamed Vocational and Career Colleges, Nzimande said.

He said the FET colleges had produced a reasonable number of artisans but that they (artisans) were used as cheap labour instead of being put into “learnerships”.

Nzimande said it was wrong to not allow a qualified person with an N6 certificate from an FET to go straight into studying for an engineering degree at a university.

“That is as if that person never did anything at all.

“That is wrong,” he said.

Nzimande also raised the alarm about the high number of unemployed youths.

He said the ministerial report on post-compulsory and post-school provision, commissioned by his predecessor Naledi Pandor, had painted a “grim picture” with this finding on 41percent of the country’s youth.

Reiterating figures he had presented to Parliament last week, he said, 2,8million out of 6,8million young people between the ages of 18 and 24 were doing nothing.

“They are neither in employment nor in an education institution, nor in any training.

“In other words, they are doing nothing,” the minister said.

Nzimande said these youths were vulnerable to exploitation as casual labourers, or being drawn into crime due to limited access to training, poor resources and a restricted job market.

“We can’t allow this situation to continue without doing something drastic about it,” the minister told the delegates.

Source: ‘Bring back artisan training colleges’

EXPOSED: We buy fake papers for R450 then purchase goods on credit worth R23 000

July 3rd, 2009

OBTAINING fraudulent financial statements that prove you are financially sound is easy in Johannesburg.

If you are determined and know what you are doing, you would probably get away with goods worth thousands of rands.

Sowetan managed to buy forged payslips and bank statements from two Internet cafés – Copy & Print and Rocky Print, both in Rocky Street, Yeoville – for R450 a set.

Generally, it costs potential conmen about R150 for a payslip and R300 for a bank statement. If you are a foreigner, you can buy asylum papers for a mere R150.

Credit reference

For a bit more, you can also get a fake proof of residence – that’s utility bills used to prove your address.

It will cost another R200 to get a certified copy of an ID that the fraudsters get stamped through a contact at Yeoville police station.

Sowetan took a payslip and a bank statement to Absa and FNB branch managers to have a look at them. According to a manager at one of the two banks, the payslip looked genuine at face value. She said the only way to verify the documents was to “call the company, in this case Stats South Africa, to verify employment, your employment number and salary”.

She said this was done when they were suspicious.

But the fraudsters can easily sidestep this hurdle. They can provide a credit reference for R200. They put one of their companies’ contact details on the payslip, and when the bank or retail store calls for a reference, the person who answers will vouch for the customer.

An FNB manager was shocked at how close the fakes resembled the real documents.

“We also get genuine-looking retail store statements. To pick it up you would have to go the extra mile and call the companies,” she said.

A fake ID seals the deal.

Professional syndicate

According to Banking Ombudsman Advocate Clive Pillay, this is where corrupt Department of Home Affairs officials come in. “We find it extremely difficult to deal with this sort of thing. There seems to be a very professional syndicate that produces IDs but with someone else’s ID numbers.

“This makes it very difficult for banks,” said Pillay.

Standard Bank spokesperson Erik Larsen said: “The banks are working closely with Home Affairs to find a solution to the problem by using a thumbprint recognition technique.”

But neither the South African Banking Risk Information Centre nor the police have detailed statistics on incidents of ID theft.

Sabric CEO Kalyani Pillay said: “ID theft is, unfortunately, an all too common occurrence. From wellknown scams such as the deposit and refund scam, through to newer methods which can use a combination of the Internet and printed documents, criminals, it seems, are still getting their own way.

l Buying the fake documents almost turned out to be a mission impossible.

We were initially under the impression that if you had money the deal would be swift. But the Internet cafè owner did not trust me and my photographer colleague.

So we had to ask an acquaintance of his to buy the documents . It took about one and half hours to seal the deal.

Source: EXPOSED: We buy fake papers for R450 then purchase goods on credit worth R23 000

Sheltered employment for useless Kaffirs

July 2nd, 2009

By Mike Smith

If one looks at Blacks in modern society one can almost feel sorry for them. They just do not fit in. They are like fish out of water. Technological and intellectual cripples, Blacks pretend and bullshit their way along in modern society. When a few Blacks are placed in a modern White western environment, they can survive quite well, because of society that is able to carry them. It is when they are completely left alone to their own devices to create similar societies that the wheels come off and one see that they are totally useless and incapable of creating anything close to resembling what White societies have accomplished.

Blacks are good at parroting. In fact I think they are far better than Whites at memorizing things and then parroting it back. It is not uncommon for Blacks to achieve high academic marks at school and tertiary institutions. They can memorize enough theory and formulas to survive and even do well. It is however when this knowledge needs to be applied that one see the deficiency and inability of Blacks. Out in the real world in the real working environment, Blacks carry on with copy and pasting from Whites.

They are so good at it that many Whites are fooled by them and think Blacks are the same as them, but what they are seeing is a Black bullshitting his way from day to day in an environment that is otherwise alien to him.

A few hundred years ago we had Black slaves. Blacks and Arabs also had other Black slaves and even Whites slaves, but that is another story…For now we will stick to Whites owning Black slaves.

Many liberals are horrified today at slavery practiced by their forefathers and cannot believe that White humans could be so “evil” towards Blacks. But why did Whites have slaves?

Slaves were just cheap labour. Blacks were just a tool Whites used to harvest crops such as cotton, grapes, etc. Times were different then and technology was not as advanced as it is today. Houses were big with large families and maids and gardeners became a handy and cheap source of labour. However, over the last hundred years technology has evolved so much that one machine can harvest more maize or wheat in one hour than a hundred Blacks can in one day. In the kitchen we see machines that can do the washing of dishes and clothes. Machines that can clean carpets and polish floors. In the garden we see machines that can cut the lawn, trim edges and cut hedges….Fact is that all these jobs we previously needed Blacks for, can now be done by ourselves. Blacks have outlived their usefulness. Nobody needs them anymore.

We never needed them in the first place. We just felt sorry for them and that is why we employed them. Just look at countries like Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Germany to see how Whites built those countries ALONE, with no cheap labour. After the Second World War the Germans were sold a Multicultural lie. They were told that they NEEDED Turkish people to rebuild Germany, when the truth is that the Germans rebuilt their country in less than ten years, BEFORE the war without the help of any Turk. The real reason for importing the Turks was to dilute the blood of the German Aryan race through miscegenation. But I digress…

Blacks are actually a gigantic milling stone around the neck of society. They do more harm than good. Having Blacks around is the root of the problem. For instance…In South Africa we need Black rubbish collectors and street sweepers when in fact the very Blacks are the ones who dirty the streets. Get rid of the Blacks and the streets will be clean. The little bit of dirt that are there can be cleaned by a single white man and a machine.

Employing blacks in your kitchen and garden is another balancing act. When you pay a Black R100 for the day to work in the garden, but he destroys equipment that Costs R2000, then you have to ask yourself if it is really worth employing them.

Same in the kitchen. When the Black maid is paid R100 to iron clothes and clean the house, but she burns clothes that cost R500 or break equipment such as washing machines or dishwashers through complete inaptitude and stupidity…then the White madam should start to reconsider her association with Sophie, the Black maid.

Whites from South Africa are normally shocked when they travel to White countries such as Germany and Scandinavia and see that the girls operating the tills are White. People who clean the bathrooms in a shopping centre are White. Road workers, house builders, bus drivers, truck drivers,… are all White. In South Africa these jobs are all done by Blacks and beneath any White person to do. However, when one lives in such a White country for a while, then one gets used to Whites doing their own work and it is not such a strange thing anymore. That is when one starts to appreciate the absence of Kaffirs and seeing one, once a week is a rarity and a joy that one cannot describe or explain.

White South Africans are often accused of enjoying sheltered employment under Apartheid. The truth is that White South Africans are hard working with an excellent work ethic. Look at South Africa today…What is Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment other than sheltered employment for Blacks? Every single job Blacks do in South Africa is sheltered employment and totally unnecessary. In White countries all over the world, people pour their own fuel for their cars. No need for Blacks to do it. In the supermarkets, people pack their own groceries in bags. No need for a Kaffir woman to stand behind the till and back your groceries for you and break your eggs and squash your bread….

Whites from Europe will find it funny when they come to South Africa for the Soccer World cup in 2010 to see all these useless and unnecessary jobs done by Blacks. All sheltered employment to keep the Kaffir masses employed and out of mischief. 

Whites in South Africa will find to their amazement that the day they ditch the Kaffir Maid and gardener, that their grocery bill comes down, their water and electricity bill drops, clothes do not disappear anymore and the house actually stays clean. When Whites ditch Kaffir “help”, they will further notice crime coming down exponentially. White South Africans should do their work themselves., stop employing Kaffirs, kick them out of White neighbourhoods, give them no food, no clothes, no money…NOTHING…When you catch one breaking in on your property, shoot the fucker! We do not need Blacks. They are totally expendable.

For all those Whites from Europe who will be visiting South Africa for the 2010 Soccer, I present to you the ten most useless, sheltered, Black employment jobs we can really do without in South Africa.

 

Number Ten, The Parking space Guide: Whether you want one or need one does not matter… There will be one. He is the guy who will “help” and guide you when you try to parallel park your car. Maybe women need this guy so that is why he is at number ten. Women cannot parallel park for shit. I on the other hand do not need this guy. I have a valid license, and have been driving since I was 18. Nowhere in Europe will you find this guy…Somehow in South Africa we need them, otherwise nobody will ever be able to successfully park their cars.

Number Nine, The Car guard: There are two varieties here. The formal ones and the informal ones. The formal ones may even include some Whites who were victims of Affirmative action. Often they do not get paid for their efforts by the company who employs them, and they only rely on donations from the public. In my entire life I have never seen a Black man give any of them a tip or donation…Only benevolent Whites who give money to car guards. These formal ones are OK, albeit useless. Look at them, Old, decrepit, fat, sometimes even handicapped…Totally unarmed…What are they going to do against gun wielding car-jackers or thieves? The informal type is the dangerous ones. They extort money from you…It works like this…You will pull up and park your car on the side of the road…Along comes a Kaffir who will tell you he will look after your car while you are gone. If you tell him it is OK he does not have to, your car will be broken into and scratched by the time you come back. If you ignore him and comes back he and his buddies will approach you for payment. Then the threats and intimidation starts. Most Whites and women just pay them and drive away…I don’t…My whole Aura radiates a “Fuck Off” attitude…Touch me and you die….Besides, I bring my pet along (see picture)…They tend to leave me alone.

Number Eight, The trolley Pusher: Amazingly Europeans are able to push their own shopping trolleys to their cars, but in South Africa, blacks do this for R2,00. Blacks also only push the trolleys of White people,because they know Whites are the only ones who are dumb enough to give them R2,00 for doing this.

 

Number Seven, The Roadworks Flag Guy: There are two types here. The one who flags down oncoming traffic, and the one who changes over the “Stop” sign to a “Go” sign. In Europe a traffic shield and or light will warn you to slow down and the stop/go traffic is regulated with a simple traffic light system. Amazingly it works like a dream with no fuck-ups. Why we need thousands of Kaffirs to do everyday what a simple light can do, God only knows. Imagine doing that job the whole day. Standing in the sun for eight hours waving a red flag all day. Or the other one…flipping a Stop sign around the whole day…Total brain-dead jobs. I can train a squirrel to do it better. Can one even call it a JOB?

Number Six, The Till Packer: In any European country you pack your own groceries into bags after it has passed through the till. This is no problem for Europeans at all and society functions perfectly well. Not In South Africa. No in SA you need a filthy Kaffir behind the till to touch your food with their grimy paws that they probably didn’t wash after the last toilet visit and haphazardly squash  your groceries into bags. Nobody needs them, Why they are there nobody knows, but they are part of South African Society since supermarkets came out. When I say, “They are there…” I mean behind the tills that are actually open, because you will find most of the time that a supermarket like Pick & Pay, or Shoprite will have twenty tills, but only four will be open and at those four the queue is normally twenty people long. It is actually like that everywhere you go. Post Office, Banks, Government departments…twenty counters, only three open. Someone who has lived in two Socialist countries told me that the first sign of Socialism and Communism is the queues…You stand in queues your entire life…oh and rations…everything is rationed.

 

Number Five, The petrol pump attendant: By law we are not allowed to pump our own petrol in South Africa. Why… is a good question…Everywhere else in the world people are capable of pumping their own petrol, but in SA if a Black Taxi driver pulls up and pumps his own petrol, there will probably be an explosion. Black petrol attendants are “trained” intensively to pump petrol…a job a white person anywhere in the world do with no training and amazingly no fuck-ups.

Number Four, The Black Gardner: The have no idea of technical things like two stroke petrol engines. Pushing the lawnmower around or sweeping with the Weedeater, is the easy part and any fool can do it. When the mower cannot start or something technically needs to be done like changing the weadeater cord…Kaffir will call you anyway, so you might just as well do the whole thing yourself. Take your shirt off, get a bronzy and work off that beer gut. Gardening is fun. Your equipment will last longer and nothing will get stolen out of your workshop or garage.

Number Three, The Black Maid: Nobody cleans your house better than yourself. Maids break things, they steal things and they work with Black criminal scum, giving information about your house and family to rob rape and kill you. Believe me, you are better off without the Black Bitch in your house. Train up hubby and the kids to pull their weight and before long you won’t even miss the Black cow.

Number Two, The Black Policeman/ Traffic cop: Do not approach them when you have a problem. Your problem will only be amplified. If you were raped and you go to a Black policeman, you will get raped again…by him. If you are lost and ask a Black policeman for directions, he will try to extort some Euros or Pounds from you. Try to get a criminal case investigated…rather ditch the case yourself, because that is exactly what the Black cop will do..ditch it into the nearest rubbish bin. He is too busy working with drugdealers and scum to make bucks on the side to see to your problem.

Number One, The Black Politician: Never in the history of the world has there been a more useless piece of shit than the Black Politician. They cannot even spell the word Politician, let alone have any understanding of how a society functions. Doing absolutely fuckall for the most amount of money is the aim of this creature. They cannot run a bath or even a small municipality in the Karoo like Beufort west. How they ever thought they could run a country is beyong understanding of normal people. The irony is that when he does absolutely fuckall it is still OK…it is when he attempts to do something that heaven should help us, because that is when everything turns to shit. At the end of the day it is actually better to pay him to do fuckall instead of allowing him to do something. It costs less.

Professor in hospital after brutal attack

July 2nd, 2009

‘…She said people in the complex were struggling to understand how something like this could happen…’

Is it so difficult out work out what happened? Out of the kindness of her heart, she gave someone the opportunity to earn a day’s wage, as do most Whites in SA. However, to this particular savage, it was not enough, so rather try and kill the woman, and steal her belongings. That’s the African way to earn a living. One solution to lessen the crime in SA is quite simple. Do not employ any Blacks. Do the work yourself. A recent comment on a previous post went along the lines of ‘…when they are only paid a measly R150 a day…’. The White population are under NO obligation to supply the Black unemployed with work. None whatsoever.

Professor in hospital after brutal attack

Graeme Hosken

July 02 2009 at 08:30AM

A renowned South Africa academic is in a serious condition in hospital after she was brutally attacked with a garden spade at her Centurion home.

Unisa criminologist Professor Anna van der Hoven, 64, was beaten, throttled and then punched while taking a cup of tea to a worker building a garden feature for her at her Lyttelton home on Wednesday.

Van der Hoven’s alleged attacker was arrested shortly after a neighbour’s domestic worker saw him fleeing his victim’s Glover Avenue home.

It is believed the 28-year-old man, who began working on the water feature on Monday, was waiting behind a wall shortly after his employers left to fetch more building materials and struck Van der Hoven repeatedly over the back of the head and neck as she walked into her garden.

‘Her face was badly swollen and she was battling to speak’

The man is then thought to have attempted to strangle her from behind before punching her in the face until she lost consciousness.

The attack on Van der Hoven, who lived alone with her three cats in Drummorgan security complex, has sparked outrage and shock among fellow academics, who have described her as a highly respected criminologist among the global academic community. As well as lecturing, Van der Hoven, until last year, served on the council of the Criminological and Victimological society of southern Africa.

Police describing the attack said it happened shortly after Van der Hoven arrived home. “As she was walking outside taking the labourer a cup of tea, he struck her over the back of the head before throttling her and then punching her in the face. He then grabbed her handbag, money and laptop computer before fleeing,” said an officer.

He said Van der Hoven’s neighbour’s domestic worker was alerted to the attack when she heard screams for help. “When she ran outside she saw Van der Hoven lying in the garden and the man running out of the property.

“Fortunately the domestic worker was able to give us a detailed description of the man who was arrested in Lenchen Avenue,” he said, adding that the laptop was recovered. The officer said they were investigating whether the suspect was linked to any other crimes.

A neighbour, who rushed to Van der Hoven’s aid when the alarm was raised, described her as an extremely kind lady.

“I was terrified. When I saw her she was covered in blood. Her face was badly swollen and she was battling to speak. She was in shock and I just held her,” she said. She said people in the complex were struggling to understand how something like this could happen, “especially to a person who had such a soft heart”.

Unisa spokesperson Doreen Gough expressed her concern over the attack and said Van der Hoven was well respected.

Dr Christiaan Bezuidenhout, a senior lecturer at University of Pretoria’s department of social work and criminology, said the attack showed that everyone, no matter who they were or their standing in life, was vulnerable to crime.

“This is a great shame. Anna gave so much to society in the way of her teachings and helping to change people’s lives and was heavily involved in the assessment of criminals in a number of well publicised trials,” he said.

Unisa forensic investigation lecturer, Dr Rudolph Zinn, a close contact of Van der Hoven, decried the attack and said it illustrated the violent nature of South Africa.

Unitas Hospital spokesperson Melisha Pather said Van der Hoven was admitted to the hospital’s intensive care unit where she was in a serious, but stable condition.

The suspect is due to appear in court soon.

Your Future State President Speaks

July 2nd, 2009

Has the time not arrived to nationalise the mines? - Julius Malema

1 July 2009

ANCYL President Julius Malema’s speaking notes on the opening of the Youth League political school, Croco Lodge, Krugersdorp, July 1 2009

“At this moment in time, when the imperialist forces are realising the accepting the failure of capitalism, we should ask whether the time has not arrived for the government of South Africa under President Zuma to make sure that the State owns the Mines and other means of production as called for in the Freedom Charter.

The Freedom Charter unites us in recognition of the fact that for genuine liberation, “the mineral wealth beneath the soil, monopoly industry and banks should be transferred to the ownership of the people as a whole”.

The truth is that the main vehicle to transform and better the living conditions of our people is through the transfer of wealth from the few to the majority, and we should do that with determination.

We have to accept that the implementation of the Freedom Charter will not please everyone. Our responsibility and obligation is to please the majority of our people, so we should not be worried that there will be problems when the Freedom Charter is implemented. It should be implemented.”

Julius Malema


Bad Behavior has blocked 1123 access attempts in the last 7 days.